[FFmpeg-cvslog] r15305 - in trunk: Makefile tests/ffmpeg.regression.ref tests/libav.regression.ref tests/regression.sh tests/rotozoom.regression.ref tests/seek.regression.ref

[Mike Melanson]

Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:35:22AM -0700, Mike Melanson wrote:
>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:18:15PM -0700, Mike Melanson wrote:
>>>> Mike Melanson wrote:
>>>>> michael wrote:
>>>>>> Author: michael
>>>>>> Date: Sat Sep 13 05:49:54 2008
>>>>>> New Revision: 15305
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>> Switch regression tests to swscale.
>>>>>> Plain C, x86-32 and -64 have been tested and should work, other
>>>>>> archs that had asm optmizations in swscale likely will need some fixes
>>>>>> to either fallback to C if SWS_BITEXACT is set or make the asm match C.
>>>>>> This also disables the PAL8 test as neither swscale or the old scaler
>>>>>> really support PAL8 output, imgconvert supported a fixed 666 palette
>>>>>> as output and swscale supports fixed 884 and 422.
>>>>> Do I need to change anything in FATE?
>>>> Judging by the build results so far, I guess I need to update all of the 
>>>> build configurations to build with swscale.
>>> You also have to update all tests that involve scaling or colorspace
>>> convertion.
>>> Also you must pass at least -sws_flags +bitexact to the tests that do.
>> Are you sure about this? Because
>>
>> ffmpeg -i full9iron-partial.mov -pix_fmt rgb24 -f framecrc -
>>
>> and
>>
>> ffmpeg -i full9iron-partial.mov -sws_flags +bitexact -pix_fmt rgb24 -f 
>> framecrc -
>>
>> and
>>
>> ffmpeg -sws_flags +bitexact -i full9iron-partial.mov -pix_fmt rgb24 -f 
>> framecrc -
>>
>> produce identical output. Output that varies from x86_32 to PPC.
>>
>> Am I missing something?
> 
> sws on ppc does not support bitexact because the flag did not exist when
> the ppc code was written and i dont have a ppc so could not test which
> parts of the ppc code where bit identical to C.
> Its the same reason why the regression tests fail on ppc ATM.
> 
> It should pass on ppc when altivec is disabled, if not then the problem
> may be elsewhere.

Then the problem must be elsewhere. --disable-altivec doesn't do change 
the output.

Also, would you expect -sws_flags +bitexact to alter the output? Because 
it doesn't, at least not with that 8BPS samples on x86_32.

-- 
     -Mike Melanson