[Ffmpeg-devel-irc] ffmpeg-devel.log.20160814

[burek]

[10:05:46 CEST] <cone-404> ffmpeg 03Paul B Mahol 07master:ec4ed2f69c24: avfilter/vf_signalstats: fix saturation calculation for >8 bit
[10:48:11 CEST] <cone-404> ffmpeg 03Moritz Barsnick 07master:d14993478cd9: libavformat/http: add support for content_type option in listen mode
[11:49:33 CEST] <michaelni> ubitux, if the edit list patch(es) should not be applied, you should probably update the status for them in patchwork.ffmpeg.org. not sure what status best refelects the situation. also tell me your patchwork account so i can give you powers to change status of patches other than your own
[12:20:09 CEST] <ubitux> michaelni: i'm testing the patchset right now
[12:20:24 CEST] <ubitux> i don't have an account yet on patchwork
[12:53:20 CEST] <ubitux> i remember someone sent me one day a great sample with edit lists
[12:53:40 CEST] <ubitux> but i can't find it anymore in my stuff :(
[12:53:48 CEST] <ubitux> nor i remember who sent it to me :(
[12:53:56 CEST] <ubitux> i might have it at work though...
[12:58:46 CEST] <ritsuka> ubitux: if you want I can cut some movies randomly with quicktime
[12:59:45 CEST] <ubitux> if it doesn't take you much time then sure :)
[16:35:51 CEST] <medfly> I hope the ffmpeg git server just happens to be running debian old or something and is not running a vulnerable version
[16:35:58 CEST] <medfly> of git
[16:36:30 CEST] <nevcairiel> its some old debian yes
[16:36:45 CEST] <nevcairiel> it was supposed to update some time ago but it failed, not sure what happened to that then
[16:45:38 CEST] <medfly> cool
[17:22:44 CEST] <Timothy_Gu> michaelni: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/76/ looks fine. Remove the period after "you can use" though
[19:05:28 CEST] <michaelni> nevcairiel, our box is not a debian box (vlc one is though), is there some new git vuln i should know of?
[19:06:02 CEST] <nevcairiel> git is on vlc isnt it
[19:06:15 CEST] <michaelni> we have git on ur server too
[19:09:25 CEST] <nevcairiel> you would have to ask medfly then what he was referring to
[19:19:37 CEST] <michaelni> nevcairiel, our git contained fixes for the vuln already
[20:48:01 CEST] <durandal_1707> ban all mplayer devs!
[20:52:55 CEST] <Compn> i asked for colorspaces and samples and such :P
[20:52:57 CEST] Action: Compn runs
[21:38:45 CEST] <RiCON> michaelni: probably https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-5696
[22:14:40 CEST] <michaelni> RiCON, for kernel stuff, Raz- is really the one to talk to
[22:41:53 CEST] <Chloe> Does anyone know if I can get the asm include files under a more liberal license?
[22:50:29 CEST] <BtbN> which files?
[22:51:09 CEST] <BtbN> And I think all asm in ffmpeg is (L)GPL?
[22:52:38 CEST] <Chloe> x86util.asm, although I guess x86inc should do 
[22:54:11 CEST] <BtbN> That's LGPL.
[22:57:38 CEST] <Chloe> Yeah. :s Some people don't like LGPL for whatever reason (not me). Oh well, thanks anyway
[22:58:24 CEST] <BtbN> It's put under that license for a reason, unlikely that you get all authors to agree on changing it to something like BSD.
[23:05:01 CEST] <durandal_1707> michaelni: what about updating topic of #ffmpeg
[23:10:54 CEST] <michaelni> durandal_1707, you now should have the power change the topic for #ffmpeg
[23:13:26 CEST] <durandal_1707> I'm on phone, so maybe tomorrow, to much typing....
[23:14:03 CEST] <BtbN> No easy topic editing in your client?
[23:54:31 CEST] <Shiz> Chloe: i think x86inc comes from x264
[23:54:36 CEST] <Shiz> they're very unlikely to relicense
[00:00:00 CEST] --- Mon Aug 15 2016