[Ffmpeg-devel-irc] ffmpeg-devel.log.20191011

[burek]

[00:00:57 CEST] <Compn> sounds like amv almost
[08:35:46 CEST] <haasn> Lynne: I see, thanks for the heads up
[11:20:30 CEST] <cone-431> ffmpeg 03Paul B Mahol 07master:e787f8fd7ee9: avfilter/vf_neighbor: check if width is 1
[12:10:10 CEST] <cone-431> ffmpeg 03Paul B Mahol 07master:7ad69a73f3d9: avfilter/vf_waveform: better guard against picking wrong pixel format
[12:25:24 CEST] <cone-431> ffmpeg 03Paul B Mahol 07master:b62f7e243cf4: avfilter/vf_deflicker: fix invalid access
[12:43:35 CEST] <cone-431> ffmpeg 03Paul B Mahol 07master:0b5672387418: avfilter/vf_bitplanenoise: fix overreads
[12:56:26 CEST] <cone-431> ffmpeg 03Paul B Mahol 07master:0e68e8c93f90: avfilter/vf_w3fdif: deny processing small videos
[13:34:19 CEST] <cone-431> ffmpeg 03Paul B Mahol 07master:71d9ae11a56d: avfilter/vf_signalstats: fix stack buffer overflow
[15:20:20 CEST] <J_Darnley> Yay.  Ryzen delivery.  I can have fun tomorrow.
[15:22:05 CEST] <JEEB> najs
[17:49:34 CEST] <Dmitri_Ovch> Hi! I sent a patch with a change in the default value of the loop filter flag for the AMF encoder(https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/15699/). this is a one-line commit that improves transcoding quality at standard values. Could you review it?
[17:52:03 CEST] <durandal_1707> michaelni: im kindly ask you again, are you ok with relicensing your changes to vf_geq to LGPL >=2.1 ?
[18:09:54 CEST] <michaelni> durandal_1707, do you need the code under LGPL ? or why do you want it to be relicensed ?
[18:28:44 CEST] <durandal_1707> michaelni: i want it relicensed under other, less restrictive license
[18:33:50 CEST] <michaelni> why do you care if you dont need it ? I think if some commercial company needs it they can donate/pay ffmpeg / pay for relicensing
[18:34:07 CEST] <michaelni> seems to make more sense to us but maybe iam missing something
[18:36:03 CEST] <durandal_1707> michaelni: code is trivial
[18:37:38 CEST] <michaelni> yes, for you but not neccessarily for some company who wants to use it in a way that needs LGPL
[18:42:07 CEST] <durandal_1707> michaelni: get real, no company will ever want to relicense geq
[19:25:37 CEST] <Lynne> I think lavfi api should have been lower level, as in no graphs at all, you do all work chaining
[19:26:24 CEST] <Lynne> and for negotiation a single function which gets 2 filter contexts as arguments would be enough
[19:27:13 CEST] <durandal_1707> Lynne: already done
[19:28:23 CEST] <durandal_1707> michaelni: why are you not coperating?
[19:29:47 CEST] <Lynne> durandal_1707: but you have to hook up inputs and outputs and configure each separately, its so annoying if all you need is a single filter
[19:30:03 CEST] <durandal_1707> patch welcome
[19:31:33 CEST] <michaelni> durandal_1707, maybe you are correct that no company will. 
[19:33:38 CEST] <michaelni> but that would just mean that noone needs it to be under LGPL at which point its even less clear to me why we should relicense it
[19:34:36 CEST] <michaelni> i mean iam not against it, it just doesnt make sense to me to do it when noone of us needs it and noone else needs it
[19:37:35 CEST] <J_Darnley> > no graphs at all, you do all work chaining
[19:37:39 CEST] <J_Darnley> sounds familiar
[19:38:35 CEST] <J_Darnley> michaelni, durandal_1707: keep it gpl so that when I am elected leader my plans aren't so shocking
[19:59:34 CEST] <durandal_1707> J_Darnley: no GPL is VIRUS, you must not be LEADER
[20:00:52 CEST] <BradleyS> paul.
[20:01:14 CEST] <durandal_1707> BradleyS: GPL is VIRUS
[20:01:21 CEST] <BradleyS> i agree
[20:01:37 CEST] <BradleyS> but you're telling people to get real and typing in caps :/
[20:01:51 CEST] <BradleyS> just because some people don't agree with you doesn't mean they're not cooperating
[20:01:56 CEST] <durandal_1707> oh, sorry
[20:02:24 CEST] <BradleyS> i think michael is just asking for a more tangible use case for lgpl than personal preferences
[20:02:47 CEST] <durandal_1707> currently company will not use ffmpeg, because geq is GPL
[20:03:33 CEST] <iive> durandal_1707, what company?
[20:03:48 CEST] <kierank> get them to pay money
[20:05:00 CEST] <JEEB> what in the name of earth is geq
[20:05:24 CEST] <JEEB> graphic equalizer?
[20:06:15 CEST] <iive> btw, if you want geq-like filter, why not make something more generic? mesa3d uses llvm to compile SIMD pixel shaders and run them on the main cpu (aka software 3d render).
[20:06:38 CEST] <iive> for a company running simd accelerated filter would be much more valuable.
[20:08:32 CEST] <iive> JEEB, generic equasion. you can write a formula that is used to calculate each pixel, 
[20:26:09 CEST] <durandal_1707> michaelni: so how many money you ask for vf_geq.c ?
[20:35:09 CEST] <kierank> one meeeelion dollars
[20:35:39 CEST] <JEEB> <insert raised pinky and the cat in the lap>
[00:00:00 CEST] --- Sat Oct 12 2019