[Ffmpeg-devel] versions, ABIs and sonames
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni
Sat Jul 23 23:43:54 CEST 2005
Hi
On Saturday 23 July 2005 22:52, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:39:26PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Saturday 23 July 2005 22:20, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:00:28AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > would there be some interrest in having nice standard a.b.c versions
> > > > for each lib (libavformat, libavcodec, libpostproc)?
> > > > so that an increase of
> > > > c means no binary compatibility breakage
> > > > b means backward compatibility (added function, ...)
> > > > a means no compatibility (function removial, ...)
> > >
> > > yes, but (c) seems pointless. if there is no compatability issue,
> > > then why bother?
> >
> > the version is stored in encoded files, encoders have bugs (every non
> > trivial thing does and an encoder is non trivial) decoders need to know
> > which encoder exactly was used if they wish to workaround these bugs
>
> the build number, not the library version, right?
>
> I think they should be separate,
proposal rejected (lack of any arguments)
[...]
--
Michael
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list