[Ffmpeg-devel] why not have h264 encoder in the libavcodec?
Mike Melanson
mike
Wed Nov 9 00:41:04 CET 2005
Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 06:57:01AM +1100, Tim Allen wrote:
>
>>Mike Melanson wrote:
>>
>>>Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:28:07AM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 03:40:41PM +0800, andy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>why not have h264 encoder in the libavcodec?
>>>>>
>>>>>because you haven't written it and submitted the patch.
>>>>
>>>>someone add this to the FAQ please :)
>>>
>>> Could probably be phrased as the more general "Why doesn't FFmpeg
>>>support feature [xyz]?" Because no one has taken on that task yet.
>>
>>No, keep it specific, challenge people :). "Why doesn't FFmpeg support
>>feature [xyz]?" "Because you haven't implemented it yet".
>
>
> Everyone please agree on a version and I will commit it immediately ;)
I will meet Tim halfway:
Q: Why doesn't FFmpeg support feature [xyz]?
A: Because no one has taken on that task yet. FFmpeg development is
driven by the tasks that are important to the individual developers. If
there is a feature that is important to you, the best way to get it
implemented is to undertake the task yourself.
That should be tactful and long-winded enough.
--
-Mike Melanson
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list