[Ffmpeg-devel] SSE load and store doubts

[Roberto Pariset]

Dave Dodge ha scritto:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 02:33:31PM +0200, Roberto Pariset wrote:
> 
>>by the way, is deassembler the only way to learn such things, or
>>maybe there's a guide? i mean, intel talks alot about what asm
>>instructions do, but i haven't found much about the intrinsics and
>>how to code sse in c.
> 
> 
> I'm not sure which Intel manuals you're looking at already.  A quick
> bit of searching finds some that might be useful.
> 
> The Intel C/C++ compiler manual at least lists the available
> intrinsics and gives some very brief introductory information.  Search
> for "intrinsics" in the index:
> 
>   http://www.intel.com/software/products/compilers/clin/docs/main_cls/index.htm
> 
> Note: the compiler manual references an SSE2 "external architecture
> specification" that does not seem to exist.
> 
> Here's a short introductory manual on using SSE and SSE2 (with both
> intrinsics and inline assembly):
> 
>   http://cache-www.intel.com/cd/00/00/01/77/17741_getting_started.pdf
> 
> There's some specific examples here:
> 
>   http://www.intel.com/design/pentiumiii/sml/
> 
> A short magazine article:
> 
>   http://www.intel.com/technology/magazine/computing/sw03011.pdf
> 
> Some online tutorials with examples; the first one may require some
> sort of registration process:
> 
>   https://shale.intel.com/SoftwareCollege/CourseDetails.asp?courseID=24
>   http://www.intel.com/software/products/college/sse2_3d/index.htm
> 
> An introduction to SSE programming:
> 
>   http://www.codeproject.com/cpp/sseintro.asp
> 
> And of course there's the instruction set reference manuals, which I
> think is where they've put the SSE stuff these days:
> 
>   http://www.intel.com/design/pentium4/manuals/index_new.htm
> 
>                                                   -Dave Dodge
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at mplayerhq.hu
> http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 

Thousand thanks Dave. I already had quite a few of those, which I
consider a good sign :) I'll keep studying then, maybe improvements
will arrive :) Thanks again,
rob