[Ffmpeg-devel] Timestamps on Decoding
Paul Curtis
pfc
Mon Oct 24 02:48:51 CEST 2005
Rich Felker wrote:
> What's _very_ difficult is recovering pts for a sequence of encoded
> frames without decoding them, using only the dts values. Having pts is
> preferable since it's slightly more general and allows you do process
> the video in ways you couldn't (easily) do with just dts, but it
> doesn't seem essential in this case.
Thanks for the response. I suspected that since I was decoding complete
frames that the dts would suffice in this instance. I also did some more
research into the Helix SDK, and yes, it does smooth its own pts based
on the complete frames presented with their start and end times.
For an example, I tripled up on frames, ie. presented the same frame
with a start and end time that was approximately three times as long. As
you would guess, the video ran three times slower. The Helix SDK is
fairly forgiving on the timings also. If they overlap slightly, the
Helix encoder seems to adjust to make the presentation smooth.
Since I can leave the actual presentation time to the encoder, I can use
the dts to keep everything in sync. When I was calculating it myself, I
could detect A/V sync drift over a long program ... more than five
minutes or so.
Thanks again to all who responded. I'm also seriously looking into
having the Helix SDK as a 'sink' for GStreamer ... that would allow for
much more flexibility than the hardcoded encoder binary I've created.
Paul
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list