[Ffmpeg-devel] [Ffmpeg-devel-old]

[Ivan Kalvachev]

2006/3/30, Mike Melanson <mike at multimedia.cx>:
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 07:44:43PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> >
> >>Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal.cx> writes:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 04:17:23PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Hi
> >>>>
> >>>>On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 03:02:03PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Hi
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 03:32:52PM +0200, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Whould it be possible the old sf.net maillist to be disabled.
> >>>>>>We are getting only trash from it. (like this one)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>if several people (>2) want it then iam not against it ...
> >>>>>but iam not sure if its the best way to get rid of spam, maybe
> >>>>>mphqs spam filtering needs to be improved ...
> >>>>
> >>>>voting results:
> >>>>1 person seems to want it closed
> >>>>2 people dont object closing it (iam interpreting this as abstain
> >>>>  if iam wrong say a clear close it/dont close it)
> >>>>
> >>>>so we failed to reach the >2 people
> >>>
> >>>I'll add a vote to close too.
> >>
> >>Go ahead, close it.
> >
> >
> > done, should i do the same to ffmpeg-user-old and cvslog-old?

Of course
(if you still need >2 people ;)

[ignore]
> but iam not sure if its the best way to get rid of spam, maybe
> mphqs spam filtering needs to be improved ...

The forwarding  makes spam detection harder. No IP blacklist check, no
helo dns verification, no SPF... only content check and if it passed
sf.net filter then it have quite big chance to pass and ours.

I just had to say it ;)
[/ignore]