[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] MS-GSM support: draft for review

Diego Biurrun diego
Mon Nov 6 21:39:40 CET 2006


On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:13:37PM +0100, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
> 
> This is not the way I see collaboration to an open-source project. When 
> someone has something that works (in a domain where things didnt work or 
> were not implemented before), you may reject code that is *grossly* 
> wrong or bloated or slow; not because you find the style not one-liney 
> enough, or complicated enough, or obfuscated enough.

I disagree.  Why disregard quality standards just because it is new?  If
somebody appeared tomorrow with - say - a complete decoder for RealVideo
3.0 and 4.0 do we have to commit it immediately even though it's full of
buffer overflows?  Hardly ...

In general it's never a good idea to sacrifice maintainability for
features.

> With 30 years of experience under my belt, I would not tolerate that 
> attitude from my head of department, and I dont think I have to accept 
> it from you.

Now calm down, no need to work up a temper :)

Michael *is* the head of department around here and while he is strict,
he is so with everybody and he always has good technical reasons for
being so.  Just split your patch into independent parts and it will be
applied in no time...

Diego




More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list