[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: Advocating periodic releases

[Dana Hudes]

Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 07:51:05PM -0700, Roman Shaposhnick wrote:
>   
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 11:47 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>     
>>> state diagram copy & pasted from an old bugzilla flame ...
>>> ----------
>>> Bugs:
>>>    /<--------------------------\
>>> New -> Verified -> Analyzed -> Fixed (-> Fixed&Checked)
>>> ^\\\-> WorksForMe  | |     \-> WontFix
>>> | \--> Duplicate <-/ |
>>> v  --> Invalid <-----/
>>> NeedMoreInfo
>>>       
>>   This seems quite reasonable. 
>>
>>     
>>> Patches:
>>>    /<-(reverse)-\
>>> New -> Ok -> Applied (->Applied&Checked)
>>> ^  \-> Rejected
>>> |
>>> v
>>> NeedsChanges
>>>       
>>   I'm sorry, but how do patches tie in into bugtracking ? 
>>     
>
> patchtracking :)
> of course the idea is optional, and unrelated but it was part of the
> original bugzilla flame from where i copy and pasted the stuff above
>
>
>   
A fix would indicate which SVN revision of which file(s) is needed to 
fix the bug. I would expect this information in the resolution. I would 
also expect the ticket not be closed until independently verified -- 
either by original requestor or the monitor(s).
> [...]
>
>