[Ffmpeg-devel] Baptiste

[Baptiste Coudurier]

Rich Felker wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 06:48:00PM +0200, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>> but it didnt help, you continue the same childish game now with the
>>> dv timecode patch and the drop timecode flag
>> I don't think discussing and exposing arguments is a childish game.
> 
> The drop timecode thing is childish.

I think it is not. That feature is useful, and Im fighting for it.

> Michael is just trying to clean
> up ffmpeg and remove broken behavior.

I don't think it is a broken behaviour. Drop frame timecode is only
allowed for 30000/1001 framerate in the code and calculation of time
code is correct atm.

> and you flame again and again

I don't think Im flaming, Im discussing and arguing.

> without ever answering his question: is there any case where you MUST
> use this ugly 'drop timecode' feature and not a more correct method?

I don't know any more correct method, though Im interested to know one.

> I'm 99% sure the answer is no, and so instead of answering the
> question you keep dodging it and flaming.

I think Trent also exposed a correct and useful scenario.

-- 
Baptiste COUDURIER                              GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
SMARTJOG S.A.                                    http://www.smartjog.com
Key fingerprint                 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
Phone: +33 1 49966312