[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: PATCH Blackfin UNALIGNED_STORES_ARE_BAD in bitstream.h
Ramiro Ribeiro Polla
ramiro
Tue Apr 17 20:16:20 CEST 2007
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 01:13:04PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 06:43:34PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:56:14AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 05:39:35PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Index: bitstream.h
>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>> --- bitstream.h (revision 8596)
>>>>>> +++ bitstream.h (working copy)
>>>>>> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
>>>>>> uint8_t run;
>>>>>> } RL_VLC_ELEM;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -#if defined(ARCH_SPARC) || defined(ARCH_ARMV4L) || defined(ARCH_MIPS)
>>>>>> +#if defined(ARCH_SPARC) || defined(ARCH_ARMV4L) || defined(ARCH_MIPS) || defined(ARCH_BFIN)
>>>>>> #define UNALIGNED_STORES_ARE_BAD
>>>>>>
>>>>> looks ok
>>>>>
>>>> IMO we should turn this the other way around:
>>>>
>>>> #if !defined(ARCH_X86) && !defined(...)
>>>>
>>>> Then the code will ALWAYS work, and just be suboptimal on archs we
>>>> haven't identified yet, rather than crashing on unknown archs.
>>>>
>>> i strongly object to this, noone would ever add any architecture besides x86
>>> to it, how should anyone even know of this line?
>>>
>> It can be documented in a porting file or something. But I strongly
>> object to having blatently nonportable code in the default build. If I
>> were trying to compile ffmpeg on a strange system and not a competent
>> coder/debugger, I would have no idea why it crashed and probably just
>> assume it was nonportable crapware rather than learning how to
>> investigate and "fix" the problem.
>>
>> An few alternatives/compromise ideas:
>>
>> 1. Enable the nonportable code by default but have a
>> --disable-nonportable-assumptions option to configure, or an
>> ARCH_GENERIC define included in the above list that configure would
>> define when the arch is unknown to inhibit all such optimizations.
>>
>> 2. Just have configure print a message directing users to a porting
>> document with references to this line and other similar lines when an
>> unknown arch is detected.
>>
>>
>
> iam fine with these, iam just strongly against silently disabling it
>
>
>
This is also being discussed in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/48933
I'm just waiting for an answer to my questions at the end of the e-mail
to make the changes and send a patch.
Ramiro Polla
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list