[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: libavformat cruft

[Diego Biurrun]

On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 07:32:40PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 04:02:33PM +0100, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
> > Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> > >
> > >Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > >>On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:34:26PM +0100, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
> > >>>Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >>>>On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:26:44PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > >>>>>On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:13:27PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > >>>>>>Mans removed these two.  What about img.c now?  Can it be removed?
> > >>>>>Other files which appear unused are cutils.c, jpeg.c, sgi.c, yuv.c.
> > >>>>all the img.c and related files can be removed if they work with img2
> > >>>cutils still appears in the Makefile, but img.c jpeg.c sgi.c yuv.c dont. 
> > >>>Could someone svn delete them?
> > >>Can somebody confirm that this stuff works with img2 now?
> > >
> > >Honestly it should, code is disabled since I removed AVImageFormat,
> > >sgi was broken anyway.
> > >
> > Maybe Diego means we should keep the code around as a source of 
> > inspiration for re-implementing the sgi image codec. But anyone 
> > interested can always retrieve it with svn co -r
> > 
> > img2 jpeg streams are known to work. yuv... well, I have problems, but 
> > since I'm not sure the problem is not with my options, I will refrain 
> > until Im sure.
> 
> OK, according to Baptiste, all of yuv.c, img.c, jpeg.c are redundant.  I
> will remove them at the end of the week.

Removed.

> What about sgi.c?  Shall we keep it as a visible reference or remove it?
> It's not hard to get it back from the repository, but maybe somebody
> thinks that its chances to get ported increase if it is a bit more
> visible ..
> 
> So I will hold off removing sgi.c until we come to a decision there.

No opinions?  I vote for removing it.

Diego