[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cleanup swscale
Baptiste Coudurier
baptiste.coudurier
Fri Jun 8 11:14:29 CEST 2007
Hi
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> -static inline void yuv2yuvXinC(int16_t *lumFilter, int16_t **lumSrc, int lumFilterSize,
>>> - int16_t *chrFilter, int16_t **chrSrc, int chrFilterSize,
>>> - uint8_t *dest, uint8_t *uDest, uint8_t *vDest, int dstW, int chrDstW)
>>> +static inline void yuv2yuvXinC(int16_t *lumFilter,
>>> + int16_t **lumSrc, int lumFilterSize,
>>> + int16_t *chrFilter,
>>> + int16_t **chrSrc, int chrFilterSize,
>>> + uint8_t *dest,
>>> + uint8_t *uDest, uint8_t *vDest,
>>> + int dstW, int chrDstW)
>> this is less readable not more than the original code
>
> people using 80col will find the latter more readable.
see below.
>> same here
>
> Idem
>>
>> [...]
>>>
>>> -static inline void yuv2packedXinC(SwsContext *c, int16_t *lumFilter, int16_t **lumSrc, int lumFilterSize,
>>> - int16_t *chrFilter, int16_t **chrSrc, int chrFilterSize,
>>> +static inline void yuv2packedXinC(SwsContext *c,
>>> + int16_t *lumFilter,
>>> + int16_t **lumSrc, int lumFilterSize,
>>> + int16_t *chrFilter,
>>> + int16_t **chrSrc, int chrFilterSize,
>> static inline void yuv2packedXinC(SwsContext *c,
>> int16_t *lumFilter, int16_t **lumSrc, int lumFilterSize,
>> int16_t *chrFilter, int16_t **chrSrc, int chrFilterSize,
>>
>
> not 80cols safe
I find Michael's way of formating really more readable than the solution
< 80 cols.
I also find having "static inline void func_name" more readable than
"static inline void"
"func_name"
I think we shouldn't break lines to fit 80 cols just for the sake of
having lines < 80 cols, but for real reasons.
--
Baptiste COUDURIER GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
SMARTJOG S.A. http://www.smartjog.com
Key fingerprint 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
Phone: +33 1 49966312
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list