[FFmpeg-devel] discussion around the best way to patch the swscale for Blackfin
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni
Fri Jun 22 10:14:15 CEST 2007
Hi
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 11:00:28PM -0400, Marc Hoffman wrote:
> On 6/14/07, Marc Hoffman <mmhoffm at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >On 6/14/07, Reimar Doeffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger at stud.uni-karlsruhe.de>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:00:44PM -0400, Marc Hoffman wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> > What do you mean "doesn't allow to use special bfin converters only
> >> for some
> >> > colourspaces"?
> >>
> >> I mean that above where you inserted you new code there is e.g.:
> >> c->swScale= gray16swap;
> >> With your patch, this gray16swap will never be used for colourspace
> >> conversion on blackfin, even if you do not have an optimized variant of
> >> it (unless you also duplicate the selection code for non-optimzed
> >> conversion in you new function, I can't know that from your patch of
> >> course ;-) ).
> >
> >
> >
> >I think we are on the same page.
> >
> >I guess I was thinking that the my function could choose to override but
> >it doesn't need to do that. The semantics of the function I would define
> >would be something like this.
> >
> >SwsFunc ff_bfin_get_unscaled_swscale (SwsContext *c)
> >{
> > SwsFunc swScale = c->swScale;
> > if ((c->flags & SWS_CPU_CAPS_BFIN) &&
> > ((c->dstFormat == PIX_FMT_YUV420P &&
> > (c->srcFormat == PIX_FMT_YUYV422 || c->srcFormat ==
> >PIX_FMT_UYVY422)))) {
> > return ff_bfin_yuy2toyv12_unscaled;
> > }
> > return c->swScale;
> >}
> >
> >
> >This way I can freely add optimizations for Blackfin with out changing the
> >existing infastructure. I guess in a sense its much like what the dsputils
> >do right now.
> >
> >Maybe I should just do this in swscale
> >
> >#ifdef ARCH_BFIN
> > ff_bfin_get_unscaled_swscale (c);
> >#endif
> >
> >And just do the following?
> >
> >void ff_bfin_get_unscaled_swscale (SwsContext *c)
> >{
> > SwsFunc swScale = c->swScale;
> > if ((c->flags & SWS_CPU_CAPS_BFIN) &&
> > ((c->dstFormat == PIX_FMT_YUV420P &&
> > (c->srcFormat == PIX_FMT_YUYV422 || c->srcFormat ==
> >PIX_FMT_UYVY422)))) {
> > c->swScale = ff_bfin_yuy2toyv12_unscaled;
> > }
> >}
> >
> >Now that you came up with a bit of confusion I'm thinking the later might
> >be a better choice for us.
>
>
>
> Does this look like a clean integration for the unscaled variant for the
> swscale infrastructure? Seems reasonably clean to me but another set of
> eyes would be great.
looks ok
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
The greatest way to live with honor in this world is to be what we pretend
to be. -- Socrates
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20070622/f7e40359/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list