[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [4/??] [1/1] Libavfilter - Build changes

[Måns Rullgård]

Vitor Sessak <vitor1001 at gmail.com> writes:

> Vitor Sessak wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>> Vitor Sessak <vitor1001 at gmail.com> writes:
>>>> M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>>>> Vitor Sessak <vitor1001 at gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch is unrelated to the graph patch (in the sense that it can
>>>>>> be applied before or after it). It allows to compile libavfilter with
>>>>>> "configure --enable-avfilter", but it will not be used at this point
>>>>>> for anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (no need to hurry in reviewing this, I'll be without internet until
>>>>>> next week)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Index: configure
>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>> --- configure    (revision 11882)
>>>>>> +++ configure    (working copy)
>>>>>> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@
>>>>>>    echo "                           and ffmpeg will be 
>>>>>> unredistributable [default=no]"
>>>>>>    echo "  --enable-pp              enable GPLed postprocessing 
>>>>>> support [default=no]"
>>>>>>    echo "  --enable-swscaler        software scaler support 
>>>>>> [default=no]"
>>>>>> +  echo "  --enable-avfilter        video filter support (replaces 
>>>>>> vhook) [default=no]"
>>>>>> +  echo "  --enable-avfilter-lavf   video filters dependant on 
>>>>>> avformat [default=no]"
>>>>> Why this distinction?
>>>> Because there is no point of having such a big dependence for just a 
>>>> few filters (like the vsrc_movie). Think about someone who wants just 
>>>> to filter video, but don't cares about encoding/decoding.
>>>
>>> So why not simply make the relevant filters depend on libavformat
>>> directly?
>> 
>> You mean compile it, unless configure is called with --disable-avformat? 
>> Sounds reasonable to me. V?ctor, Diego?
>
> Sorry to reply to self, but I was not clear. I meant to ask your opinion 

Yes, that's what I meant.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com