[FFmpeg-devel] [Hardware Accelerator for Video and Audio]
Benjamin Zores
ben
Thu Feb 21 09:44:25 CET 2008
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:00 AM, kenye ye <kenyeby at gmail.com> wrote:
> Would you describe which is ways what you want, how it works ?
> That will help us to decide PCIe or USB version, which is the first
> one.
> In our opinion, USB version would be better in first stage becasue it is
> more popular.
Will also consumes most resources.
If you plan on adding it on laptops or small form PCs/HTPCs, it's also
easier having it in PCI(e) format imho.
> It will handle video display in first stage. we try to accelerate more
> actions.
> Do you need to handle the output ?
I'm thinking of this from a usability point of view.
It's a bit annoying when you have a display dedicated to videos.
How and where is rendered the GUI/WM/anything_else_that_is_not_video ?
> > I'd personnally be much more interested in the first approach.
> > That's also the approach taken by VaAPI IIRC.
>
> What is VaAPI IIRC ?
See previous mails.
You even told you are going to contact the author :-)
Ben
--
"My life, and by extension everyone else's is meaningless."
Bender, Futurama
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list