[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Warn about PAFF & Spatial

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 07:30:51PM -0400, Mark Buechler wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:44:26AM -0700, Serguei Miridonov wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:45:16AM -0700, Serguei Miridonov wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:02:01AM -0700, Serguei Miridonov
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > > > > > If i knew where the problem is exactly i would fix it.
> > > > > > > > Besides i honestly dont care about PAFF & MBAFF at all.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Michael, I do not ask you why just because this is a
> > > > > > > developing list. But could you please post a few links which
> > > > > > > you think best explain pro and contra of 24/p video? For me
> > > > > > > 60/i video looks much much smoother than 24/p. On TV or
> > > > > > > computer monitor -- does not matter. So,if 24/p is so good,
> > > > > > > what I do wrong with 24/p video captured by my camcorder?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > then use 60/p
> > > > >
> > > > > Camcorder does not support that. So?
> > > >
> > > > Complain to the company that made it ...
> > >
> > > You are so kind. Thank you.
> >
> > What did you expect?
> > Something like:
> > "Ill spend 1+ weeks and fix the bugs that i dont care about at all"
> > ?
> 
> 
> > Why dont you fix the bug? Or help cleaning up h264.c if first is too
> > hard?
> >
> > And seriously, if enough people complain about the lack of proper
> > progressive support in camcorders, maybe the industry will eventually
> > listen.
> > And its a good idea even with all the *AFF code working.
> >
> > [...]
> 
> 
> You don't give yourself enough credit. I have every confidence you could
> have it fixed in 6 days if you tried.

Well i couldnt fix dark shikaris IP progressive H264 that shows artifacts
in maybe 8 hours. And i know the progressive related code alot better than
the PAFF stuff ...

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Thouse who are best at talking, realize last or never when they are wrong.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080724/f2fb4b21/attachment.pgp>