[FFmpeg-devel] What's Going On With x264 and GSoC?
Jason Garrett-Glaser
darkshikari
Tue Mar 18 01:30:43 CET 2008
Mike,
Ah, what happened was that ffmpeg was approved before VLC, so I tossed
x264 on ffmpeg with the assumption that VLC hadn't been approved,
because I thought all the approval letters had gone out and VLC hadn't
gotten one...
... and then it turned out both of them were actually approved.
I'm not exactly sure which project would be more appropriate to stick
with at this point--what would be your advice?
Dark Shikari
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Mike Melanson <mike at multimedia.cx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> x264 has attached itself to FFmpeg's SoC effort. Okay, fine. However, I
> noticed that they are also attached to VLC's SoC effort. What's going on
> here? Are they trying to hedge their bets? If so, both FFmpeg and VLC
> have been accepted into the 2008 GSoC. So I don't know if it's
> worthwhile for x264 to be attached to both. In fact, it may be
> detrimental and confusing.
>
> --
> -Mike Melanson
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at mplayerhq.hu
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list