[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [2/??] [3/3] Filter graphs - Parser for a graph description

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Wed Mar 19 16:36:24 CET 2008


On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:01:41PM +0000, vmrsss wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> On 19 Mar 2008, at 14:00, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
[...]
> >
> > [...]
> >> As for the extra operator, you are right. However, I claim that in
> >> order to allow reusable libraries of graphs in your syntax you will
> >> have to provide a renaming operator, eg:
> >>
> >>  	{tmp1/in} (in)overlay(out) {tmp2/out}  = (tmp1) overlay (tmp2)
> >
> > You are inventing some syntax and then complain about it, there is  
> > nothing
> > in the code nor in any mails from vitor suggesting anything like  
> > above.
> 
> Hmm, I might not have made myself clear: sure you haven't suggested  
> anything like the above, I am arguing (and made a specific example in  
> support) that you **have** to if you want to reuse filters.

Look, as there is nothing specified about "reuseable libraries" any
system/syntax could be used, this clearly would allow to use "your syntax"
as well thus this is a proper proof that it cannot be worse than "your
syntax".

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Frequently ignored awnser#1 FFmpeg bugs should be sent to our bugtracker. User
questions about the command line tools should be sent to the ffmpeg-user ML.
And questions about how to use libav* should be sent to the libav-user ML.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080319/a25daa29/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list