[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Patches to fix issue453 in libdiracschroedinger
Diego Biurrun
diego
Tue May 27 10:43:58 CEST 2008
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 10:26:59AM +1000, Anuradha Suraparaju wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 22:15 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:26:16PM +1000, Anuradha Suraparaju wrote:
> > >
> > > - p_frame_output->frame_num = (enc_buf->data[13] << 24) +
> > > - (enc_buf->data[14] << 16) +
> > > - (enc_buf->data[15] << 8) +
> > > - enc_buf->data[16];
> > > - }
> > > + p_frame_output->frame_num = (schro_buf->data[13] << 24) +
> > > + (schro_buf->data[14] << 16) +
> > > + (schro_buf->data[15] << 8) +
> > > + schro_buf->data[16];
> >
> > reindention counts as cosmetic as well
> > so yes the if&assert should be removed and the indention then fixed in a
> > seperate patch, this keeps svnlog and patches more human readable.
>
> I want to make sure that I understood this correctly. So I remove the if
> & assert in one patch and submit it. Then I fix the indentation and
> other cosmetic changes mentions and submit a second patch. Is this
> correct?
Yes.
Diego
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list