[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] flv set pts
Baptiste Coudurier
baptiste.coudurier
Sun Nov 16 03:56:59 CET 2008
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 07:51:05PM -0800, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 01:02:53PM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:00:59PM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>>>>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:28:45AM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 07:56:17PM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> $subject.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Scratch old patch, this one should be correct.
>>>>>>>>> can you post some example input&output pts & dts values for some file
>>>>>>>>> with b frames.
>>>>>>>>> I suspicion would be that the patch is not completely correct but this
>>>>>>>>> should be more obvious from a list of timestamps and frame types.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, I didn't find any having < 0 cts yet, however it has been said
>>>>>>>> that cts is signed like in .mov, so code is assuming that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Files generated by FFmpeg does not have < 0 cts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Patch is doing the same as the .mov demuxer excepts that we cannot know
>>>>>>>> in advance while we can in .mov, though it misses has_b_frames = 1, I
>>>>>>>> can see, not harmful though.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What do you think could be wrong ? I'll try to find a file in the mean time.
>>>>>>> Well
>>>>>>> if we take as example normal mpeg2 style IPB then
>>>>>>> IPBBPBB
>>>>>>> dts: 0123456
>>>>>>> pts: 1423756
>>>>>>> would be correct
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> now if dts where increased by one:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IPBBPBB
>>>>>>> dts: 1234567
>>>>>>> pts: 1423756
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> then this would be wrong, and not only the ones for the B frames
>>>>>>> would be wrong but all would be. That is for example if the I frame
>>>>>>> is feeded at time 1 into the decoder then it will be output at time 2 not 1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Humm of course yes, and in your situation, cts will be -1 for the third
>>>>>> frame to achieve dts 3 and pts 2, I don't see what you mean, the check
>>>>>> is indeed for cts < 0.
>>>>> well, i think the demuxer would output:
>>>>>
>>>>> dts: 12-----
>>>>> pts: 1423756
>>>>>
>>>>> but this is wrong for the first 2 frames
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, that is true, what can we do about that ?
>>>> It's sad not to set pts for correct files, what do you suggest ?
>>> iam fine with the patch if it also prints some warning that the past
>>> timestamps might have been wrong
>> Patch updated.
>
> ok if it passes regressions and has been tested with a h264 flv or 2
Tested and applied.
--
Baptiste COUDURIER GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
Key fingerprint 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
checking for life_signs in -lkenny... no
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list