[FFmpeg-devel] [VOTE] please vote for our NGO name

Kostya kostya.shishkov
Tue Dec 15 17:15:16 CET 2009


On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:56:11PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 05:45:41PM +0200, Kostya wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:31:59PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 05:27:16PM +0200, Kostya wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 03:59:29PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:52:02PM +0200, Kostya wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 03:36:42PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:23:15AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > * FFm.org (Foundation for Free Multimedia)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Freebie Flash movies foundation?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > That would be .flv.org or .f4v.org, this one is named after FFserver own
> > > > > > format.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I just tried to express how much I think the name sucks..
> > > > 
[...]
> > 
> > To rephrase it: have you proposed a better name?
> 
> Yes.  But there is really no need, it's the worst name from a long list.

Ah.

> > any objective criteria for judging those names?
> 
> The names should not give a wrong impression to 99% of people.
> They should not be specific to FFmpeg.

Well, the best example around is Xiph - short, not specific and does not
give a wrong impression. And I really think it may be the best to take
short [seemingly] meaningless name, but since we ended with that list
containing homogenous names just grab your d6 and vote.

> Diego



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list