[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Altivec versions of h264's weight/biweight functions

[David Conrad]

On Jan 5, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Guillaume POIRIER wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:20 PM, David Conrad <lessen42 at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This also has sat on my HD for too long.
>
> Thanks for sharing!
>
> I applied only the biweight part since my video sample didn't use
> those new weight, and I wanted to make damn sure everything worked as
> expected before committing anything.

As caught by fate test #177, it was actually wrong (I was using  
unsigned for signed values...)

Also an updated patch that should fix compilation with gcc 4.3+

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-offset-and-weights-are-signed.txt
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090106/9d3c111e/attachment.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 0002-Fix-compilation-with-gcc-4.3.txt
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090106/9d3c111e/attachment-0001.txt>