[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] RGB32 pixfmts cleanup

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:56:30PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Monday 2009-03-16 19:31:27 +0100, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:31:56AM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > On date Sunday 2009-03-15 20:39:08 +0100, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 06:25:35PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > 
> > > > > the attached (non-working) patch shows my idea for what regards a
> > > > > RGB32 pixfmts cleanup, I think this should somehow simplify the way we
> > > > > deal with such formats, also it delivers more meaningful names.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Main problem is that I'm duplicating the number of the RGB32 formats.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Comments on this are very welcome, if we decide to take this path I'd
> > > > > like to commit this before the end of the next week, thus taking
> > > > > advantage of the flux status of the API and avoiding to #ifversion.
> > > > [...]
> > > > > @@ -114,6 +110,15 @@
> > > > >      PIX_FMT_BGR555BE,  ///< packed BGR 5:5:5, 16bpp, (msb)1A 5B 5G 5R(lsb), big-endian, most significant bit to 1
> > > > >      PIX_FMT_BGR555LE,  ///< packed BGR 5:5:5, 16bpp, (msb)1A 5B 5G 5R(lsb), little-endian, most significant bit to 1
> > > > >  
> > > > > +    PIX_FMT_ARGB32BE,  ///< packed ARGB 8:8:8:8, 32bpp, (msb)8A 8R 8G 8B(lsb), big-endian
> > > > > +    PIX_FMT_ARGB32LE,  ///< packed ARGB 8:8:8:8, 32bpp, (msb)8A 8R 8G 8B(lsb), little-endian
> > > > > +    PIX_FMT_RGBA32BE,  ///< packed RGBA 8:8:8:8, 32bpp, (msb)8R 8G 8B 8A(lsb), big-endian
> > > > > +    PIX_FMT_RGBA32LE,  ///< packed RGBA 8:8:8:8, 32bpp, (msb)8R 8G 8B 8A(lsb), little-endian
> > > > > +    PIX_FMT_ABGR32BE,  ///< packed ABGR 8:8:8:8, 32bpp, (msb)8A 8B 8G 8R(lsb), big-endian
> > > > > +    PIX_FMT_ABGR32LE,  ///< packed ABGR 8:8:8:8, 32bpp, (msb)8A 8B 8G 8R(lsb), little-endian
> > > > > +    PIX_FMT_BGRA32BE,  ///< packed BGRA 8:8:8:8, 32bpp, (msb)8B 8G 8R 8A(lsb), big-endian
> > > > > +    PIX_FMT_BGRA32LE,  ///< packed BGRA 8:8:8:8, 32bpp, (msb)8B 8G 8R 8A(lsb), little-endian
> > > > > +
> > > > 
> > > > this is sick
> > > 
> > > Please expand, this is not obvious to me (are you referring to the
> > > duplication?).
> > 
> > yes, the very same pixel format exists twice under 2 different enum
> > values
> 
> I see. Just a random (and maybe bad) idea:
> 
> enum PixelFormat {
> ...
>   PIX_FMT_RGBA32BE,
>   PIX_FMT_BGRA32BE,
>   PIX_FMT_ARGB32BE,
>   PIX_FMT_ABGR32BE,
> ...
> };

I am VERY VERY strongly against these names

ARGB
RGBA
...
have perfectly clear and intuitiv definitions

and RGB48 LE & BE also have clear and totally different meaning from how
you use LE/BE here


-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Avoid a single point of failure, be that a person or equipment.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090318/83847ecf/attachment.pgp>