[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Do not assume long is same width as x86 register in swscale.

[Ramiro Polla]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 06:26:05PM -0300, Ramiro Polla wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Ramiro Polla <ramiro.polla at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >>> Index: libswscale/swscale-example.c
>> >>> ===================================================================
>> >>> --- libswscale/swscale-example.c ? ? ?(revision 28974)
>> >>> +++ libswscale/swscale-example.c ? ? ?(working copy)
>> >>> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@
>> >>>
>> >>> ? ? ?for (y=0; y<H; y++){
>> >>> ? ? ? ? ?for (x=0; x<W*4; x++){
>> >>> - ? ? ? ? ? ?rgb_data[ x + y*4*W]= random();
>> >>> + ? ? ? ? ? ?rgb_data[ x + y*4*W]= rand();
>> >>> ? ? ? ? ?}
>> >>> ? ? ?}
>> >>> ? ? ?sws_scale(sws, rgb_src, rgb_stride, 0, H, src, stride);
>> >>
>> >> no
>> >> we have our own PRNG
>> >
>> > Oops. That and the cs_test bit weren't supposed to go to the patch.
>>
>> > I've thought about making this use the native PRNG, but I'm too lazy
>> > to send a patch for it. I might in the following in days if someone
>> > doesn't beat me to it.
>>
>> I wasn't sure what was the best PRNG for this case, or even if using
>> random_seed was necessary. I'm guessing LFG with seed 1 is good
>> enough?
>
> ok

Applied.