[FFmpeg-devel] [Fwd: Summer of code small task patch]
Diego Biurrun
diego
Sat Mar 28 13:52:50 CET 2009
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 01:30:39PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:42:46PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 06:23:14AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:18:07PM +0200, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- libavcodec/dct-test.c (revision 18203)
> > > > +++ libavcodec/dct-test.c (working copy)
> > > > @@ -46,9 +46,9 @@
> > > > void *fast_memcpy(void *a, const void *b, size_t c){return memcpy(a,b,c);};
> > > >
> > > > /* reference fdct/idct */
> > > > -void fdct(DCTELEM *block);
> > > > -void idct(DCTELEM *block);
> > > > -void init_fdct(void);
> > > > +void ff_ref_fdct(DCTELEM *block);
> > > > +void ff_ref_idct(DCTELEM *block);
> > > > +void ff_ref_dct_init(void);
> > >
> > > renaming things should be a seperate patch
> > > actually a patch should either do functional changes or non functional not
> > > both
> >
> > I think this should be treated differently, he is creating an entirely
> > new and independent file. Adding a renaming step in between is
> > pointless extra work.
>
> What do you suggest exactly?
Add the new file and apply the renamings in one go. I see no benefit in
splitting this. The renamings are straightforward and I verified the
patch to be correct. It's thus fully reviewed and trivial, I'd like to
apply the patch as-is when the other issues you pointed out have been
addressed.
Diego
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list