[FFmpeg-devel] [FFMPEG] [PATCH] cavs encoder

[Stefan Gehrer]

zhihang wang wrote:
>  Yes, I guess such things have to be expected if an already published
> 
>> specification is changed in a way which is not backwards compatible.
>> I am aware of that one additional marker_bit before the picture_distance
>> element in I picture headers. Are there any more - maybe more serious -
>> incompatibilities?
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>    Yes. for example, the intra prediction and the DCT are also changed.

I see. And there is really no way to see in the bitstream whether
the old way or the new way of doing things is the correct one?

Stefan