[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] RTMP seek support
Stefano Sabatini
stefano.sabatini-lala
Sun Apr 18 21:11:06 CEST 2010
On date Monday 2010-04-12 09:06:52 -0700, Howard Chu encoded:
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 08:27:32AM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> >>Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>>On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 04:40:06PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> >>>>Instead of these magical conventions that aren't at all obvious from
> >>>>reading the code or its documentation, why not use:
> >>>> current_ts, target_ts, flag.
> >>>>
> >>>>For exact seek you can still use current_ts = INT64_MIN as a special case
> >>>>but otherwise you drop one useless parameter.
> >>>
> >>>an application might prefer to do seeking with all 3 timestamps different,
> >>>above where just examples.
> >>
> >>OK.
> >>
> >>We've gotten sidetracked anyway. So one more time with this patch. To
> >>actually implement flv_read_seek2 correctly, there would need to be some
> >>corresponding av_url_read_fseek2() function to propagate these timestamps
> >>down to the ByteIOContext and URLContext. Since there is no such API at the
> >>moment, there's not much more I can do with this.
> >
> >you could add such api ;)
> >
> >anyway that patch looks ok given it works and passes tests
>
> Ah, there's a problem. url_seek() is returning AVERROR(EPIPE) not
> AVERROR(ENOSYS), so av_url_read_fseek() returns failure. (But the
> seek request was issued.)
>
> I was assuming this patch was going in already
>
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2010-April/086705.html
>
> and this patch depended on that assumption. oops.
Fixed the dependancy patch, and applied this too.
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2010-April/086739.html
Thanks for the patch, regards.
--
FFmpeg = Fostering & Funny Mean Powered Elaborated Gadget
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list