[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Reimplement ff_img_copy_plane() as av_img_copy_plane() in libavcore, and deprecate the old function.
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni
Tue Aug 24 13:06:45 CEST 2010
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:49:14PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Friday 2010-08-20 00:38:16 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:54:27PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > On date Thursday 2010-08-19 12:44:34 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:37:39PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > diff --git a/libavcore/imgutils.h b/libavcore/imgutils.h
> > > > > index 874bef1..03e2e88 100644
> > > > > --- a/libavcore/imgutils.h
> > > > > +++ b/libavcore/imgutils.h
> > > > > @@ -104,4 +104,24 @@ int av_fill_image_pointers(uint8_t *data[4], enum PixelFormat pix_fmt, int heigh
> > > > > */
> > > > > int av_check_image_size(unsigned int w, unsigned int h, int log_offset, void *log_ctx);
> > > > >
> > > > > +/**
> > > > > + * Copy image plane data in src_data to dst_data.
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * @param dst_linesize linesizes for the image in dst_data
> > > > > + * @param src_linesize linesizes for the image in src_data
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +static inline
> > > > > +void av_copy_image_plane(uint8_t *dst_data, int dst_linesize,
> > > >
> > > > why static inline?
> > >
> > > Should be faster, and the function looks small enough, if you prefer
> > > to keep it non-static inline I'm fine as well.
> >
> > i prefer non static non inline
>
> Updated.
>
> BTW do you want to remove the static inline to
> av_fill_image_max_pixsteps() as well?
>
> Regards.
> --
> FFmpeg = Friendly and Fabulous Magical Powered Entertaining Gnome
> libavcodec/dsputil.c | 3 ++-
> libavcodec/dsputil.h | 7 +++++++
> libavcodec/imgconvert.c | 14 ++++----------
> libavcore/imgutils.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> libavcore/imgutils.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 1df6f1b8bb80c899d76182d274c89341880c6b1e 0001-Reimplement-ff_img_copy_plane-as-av_copy_image_plane.patch
> From c4ea0edd25c06ee1cd757bdb545bc513143756cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it>
> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:22:08 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Reimplement ff_img_copy_plane() as av_copy_image_plane() in libavcore,
> and deprecate the old function.
>
> ---
> libavcodec/dsputil.c | 3 ++-
> libavcodec/dsputil.h | 7 +++++++
> libavcodec/imgconvert.c | 14 ++++----------
> libavcore/imgutils.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> libavcore/imgutils.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/dsputil.c b/libavcodec/dsputil.c
> index 534f03f..57ea273 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/dsputil.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/dsputil.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> * DSP utils
> */
>
> +#include "libavcore/imgutils.h"
> #include "avcodec.h"
> #include "dsputil.h"
> #include "simple_idct.h"
> @@ -4466,7 +4467,7 @@ av_cold void dsputil_init(DSPContext* c, AVCodecContext *avctx)
> c->sv_fmul_scalar[0] = sv_fmul_scalar_2_c;
> c->sv_fmul_scalar[1] = sv_fmul_scalar_4_c;
>
> - c->shrink[0]= ff_img_copy_plane;
> + c->shrink[0]= av_copy_image_plane;
for consistency i would suggest that all these functions be named like
av_image_* or av_pic_*
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
I wish the Xiph folks would stop pretending they've got something they
do not. Somehow I fear this will remain a wish. -- M?ns Rullg?rd
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100824/72bed1cc/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list