[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove swscale_internal.h:fmt_depth()
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni
Mon Jan 18 00:11:03 CET 2010
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 11:36:26PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Sunday 2010-01-17 22:04:47 +0100, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 06:46:40PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > On date Saturday 2010-01-16 17:08:48 -0200, Ramiro Polla encoded:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Stefano Sabatini
> > > > <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> wrote:
> > > > > Hi, I'm aware this patch introduces a slow-down, an idea would be to
> > > > > initialize a ff_bits_per_pixel array during the init phase, and then
> > > > > use a function of the kind:
> > > > >
> > > > > static inline int fmt_depth(int fmt)
> > > > > {
> > > > > ? ?return ff_bits_per_pixel[fmt];
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > Would be that acceptable?
> > > > > In this case can you suggest where to initialize stuff?
> > > >
> > > > I think all code that uses fmt_depth currently should eventually be
> > > > moved to some init code that's only run once, and so a small slow-down
> > > > wouldn't be a problem.
> > >
> > > Check the attached: smaller, more extensible, faster, the price is a
> > > little more bloat in the context.
> > >
> >
> > > Regression test passed.
> >
> > if(regression == swscale_example) patch ok
> > else not ok
>
> I had to hack swscale-example since the recent change in pixfmt.h
> broke it (BTW does it ever worked with big-endian system?), anyway
i suspect yes
but people are always eager to fix bugs at the wrong place and its so
easy to flip a rgb<->bgr that i cannot test
> what should I test with swscale-example?
everything you plan to commit to swscale:)
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Observe your enemies, for they first find out your faults. -- Antisthenes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100118/48c728c9/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list