[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] New library for shared non-generic libav* utils

[Måns Rullgård]

Baptiste Coudurier <baptiste.coudurier at gmail.com> writes:

> On 07/09/2010 11:02 AM, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>> Baptiste Coudurier<baptiste.coudurier at gmail.com>  writes:
>>
>>> On 07/09/2010 09:48 AM, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>>> Michael Niedermayer<michaelni at gmx.at>   writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:41:59PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>>>>> Michael Niedermayer<michaelni at gmx.at>   writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I spended alot of time on libavutil and its only goal was to become
>>>>>>> a general utils lib
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Said who?  It wasn't even your idea to begin with.  It was suggested
>>>>>> and implemented by Alexander Strasser.
>>>>>
>>>>> svn blame of *.c *.h says:

[...]

>>>>> so id say, yes iam still the primary maintainer and author, even if
>>>>> we consider that blame is not the worlds most idiot proof way to
>>>>> check this
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you wrote more lines than anyone else, but not by any large
>>>> margin.  Of the total ~11k lines, you only contributed roughly 25%.
>>>> If lines were votes, you'd be losing.  You seem to like votes...
>>>
>>> Nah, this is heavily biased. A lot of lines are defines and macros in
>>> *.h, not talking about the recent controversial documentation commits.
>>
>> Much of libavutil functionality resides in header files, so counting
>> them is anything but biased.Are you jealous because your name didn't
>> show up at all?
>
> Are you on crack ? You'd better stop your childish game and get your
> shit together Mans. You are going too far.

You are the one who needs to calm down.  Did I do something to offend
you?  A while ago when you and Michael had a big fight, I mostly sided
with you.  Is this the thanks I get?

> And no libavutil functionality does not reside in header files.

Then how do you explain the headers being more than half the line count?

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com