[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Implement guessed_pts in avcodec_decode_video2.
Måns Rullgård
mans
Tue Feb 1 13:47:17 CET 2011
Alexander Strange <astrange at ithinksw.com> writes:
> On Jan 30, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas George <nicolas.george at normalesup.org>
>> ---
>> cmdutils.c | 27 ---------------------------
>> cmdutils.h | 24 ------------------------
>> ffmpeg.c | 14 ++++++--------
>> ffplay.c | 10 +++-------
>> libavcodec/avcodec.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> libavcodec/utils.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>>
>> This patch moves the guess_correct_pts function from cmdutils to libavcodec.
>> The feature is available through a new field in AVFrame, guessed_pts.
>>
>> make test and ffplay still work, but I would like to have some more time to
>> read it carefully, but I have things to do in the next few days, and this
>> feature was discussed in another thread, so here the current version. It
>> will conflict with some patches that will certainly soon be applied, so I
>> will update and submit it again anyway.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Nicolas George
>>
>> [..]
>> +\
>> + /**\
>> + * pts estimated using various heuristics, in stream time base\
>> + * - encoding: unused\
>> + * - decoding: set by libavcodec, read by user.\
>> + */\
>> + int64_t guessed_pts;\
>
> It's not quite estimated, it's chosen from either pts or dts. I
> think the name should be reassuring - though I can't think of one,
> just 'timestamp'?
> Also, the comment should say that clients can rely on this as the
> time of the frame.
But can they? The current code certainly doesn't look reliable to me.
--
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list