[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Non-blocking protocols: flag and documentation
Luca Barbato
lu_zero
Sat Feb 5 20:04:20 CET 2011
On 02/04/2011 08:01 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Nicolas George
> <nicolas.george at normalesup.org> wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas George <nicolas.george at normalesup.org>
>> ---
>> doc/APIchanges | 3 +++
>> libavformat/avio.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> Changes since the last time I sent these patches:
>>
>> - First one (factor poll in TCP) got applied; rest rebased on the current
>> head.
>>
>> - Doxygen group for URL_RDONLY/URL_RDWR/URL_WRONLY.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I'm basically willing to apply this, I'm wondering if we need a flag
> to indicate which URLProtocols support non-blocking opening. Anyone
> have opinions on this? Or should we just assume it'll always be
> supported for all protocols? (Does file/pipe/etc. support it now?)
I'm ok with the patch, I'm not sure which protocol should not support
non-blocking but if we implement some kind of hardware specific protocol
it might have some specificities.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list