[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Fix empty G-VOP header decoding in MPEG-4
Anatoly Nenashev
anatoly.nenashev
Thu Feb 10 14:48:34 CET 2011
On 10.02.2011 01:32, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Anatoly Nenashev<anatoly.nenashev at ovsoft.ru> writes:
>
>
>> On 08.02.2011 22:00, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>
>>> Anatoly Nenashev<anatoly.nenashev at ovsoft.ru> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi all!
>>>> There are some cameras which send mpeg-4 streams with empty G-VOP header.
>>>> This part of stream looks like this:
>>>> ... 00 00 01 B3 00 00 00 01 B6 ...
>>>> Sample file uploaded in issue 2592.
>>>> FFmpeg reports "header damaged" and ignores first I-frame in G-VOP.
>>>> Attached patch fix this problem.
>>>>
>>>> Anatoly.
>>>>
>>>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Looking at this, I wonder why this is there at all. The s->time_base
>>> field is only used to incorrectly set the pts field of the decoded
>>> frame (now I understand why those values always are wrong). The
>>> actual PTS is passed from the input packet to the pkt_pts field of the
>>> output frame.
>>>
>>> IMO this nonsense should be removed. The time_code field in the
>>> bitstream has nothing to do with PTS.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Hmm... So, if I understand you clearly, we just can ignore GOP header
>> as done in attached patch.
>>
> The value seems to also be used in a convoluted calculation of direct
> mode MVs. This calculation doesn't actually need the time_code value,
> only the distance (in frames) between reference frames and the predicted
> frame. I'd be careful messing with it.
>
> The part setting the PTS of the output frame should of course be
> removed. It is clearly wrong.
>
>
I've changed original patch to carefully check that time code obtained
from GOP header is monotone.
Also PTS setting for output frame is removed. See attachment.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mpeg4_v4.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20110210/bcb896bf/attachment.bin>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list