[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/4] URLContext: introduce a slave URLContext.

[Nicolas George]

Le decadi 30 pluvi?se, an CCXIX, Luca Barbato a ?crit?:
> That might not work that well if our higher protocol uses many low level
> one in a batch (e.g. rtp)

Yes, I have thought about RTP before designing this part of the code, but I
could come with no elegant solution.

Note that this "slave" fields does not make things harder for protocols like
RTP: apart from wasting the memory for the field, it is completely neutral.
And it does make things easier for protocols like HTTP or RTMP.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20110218/8541fa4a/attachment.pgp>