[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Checked get_bits.h functions to prevent overread
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni at gmx.at
Fri Sep 9 14:41:18 CEST 2011
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:03:40PM +0200, Laurent Aimar wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:46:34AM +0000, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Laurent Aimar <fenrir <at> elivagar.org> writes:
> >
> > > > > I have a list of crashes with their backtraces. A lot of the files used
> > > > > comes from VLC and mplayer FTP and so will probably be easy to retreive.
> > > >
> > > > > Is sending it to the ML is the right choice ?
> > > >
> > > > What's wrong with opening a ticket as explained on
> > > > http://ffmpeg.org/bugreports.html?
> > >
> > > It depends. I can create a unique ticket for the backtrace I have
> >
> > That would be great! (or do you mean you could but it is too much effort?)
> I meant that I have no problem creating a few tickets if that's what would be
> usefull for ffmpeg but it would be too much work for me to create a ticket for
> each crash.
> Also, as the bug tracker is probably public, I can also simply send the list
> first to this ML and then we can work from that ?
yes, or maybe better open a single ticket with the list and this can
then over time be split up into multiple tickets.
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
I hate to see young programmers poisoned by the kind of thinking
Ulrich Drepper puts forward since it is simply too narrow -- Roman Shaposhnik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20110909/bda2f14d/attachment.asc>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list