On 7/13/12, Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/07/2012 9:29 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> redundant
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>> nit: {} is not needed.
>
> Nifty, but completely irrelevant to this patch.
>
> Cosmetics for unrelated things belong elsewhere.
As you wish.