On 7/13/12, Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis at gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/07/2012 9:29 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> redundant >>> return ret; >>> } >> nit: {} is not needed. > > Nifty, but completely irrelevant to this patch. > > Cosmetics for unrelated things belong elsewhere. As you wish.