[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] swscale: fix To{Y, UV} extern prototypes.
Clément Bœsch
ubitux at gmail.com
Sun Sep 30 22:27:04 CEST 2012
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:18:45PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 08:48:23PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 05:04:20PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:54:02AM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> > > > This fix a bunch of "assignment from incompatible pointer type" warnings
> > > > with GCC.
> > > > ---
> > > > What I'm afraid of is that the prototypes don't seem to match what's in
> > > > sws/x86/input.asm (based on the comments) in comparison to the C versions in
> > > > sws/swscale.c.
> > >
> > > i think the comments are wrong
> >
> > OK, see attached patch then.
> >
> > > following is the difference of the input.asm "prototypes" to libav
> > >
> > > -cglobal %2 %+ 24ToY, 3, 3, %1, dst, src, w
> > > +cglobal %2 %+ 24ToY, 6, 6, %1, dst, src, u1, u2, w, u3
> > > -cglobal %2 %+ 24ToUV, 3, 4, %1, dstU, dstV, src, w
> > > +cglobal %2 %+ 24ToUV, 7, 7, %1, dstU, dstV, u1, src, u2, w, u3
> > > -cglobal %2%3%4%5 %+ ToY, 3, 3, %1, dst, src, w
> > > +cglobal %2%3%4%5 %+ ToY, 6, 6, %1, dst, src, u1, u2, w, u3
> > > -cglobal %2%3%4%5 %+ ToUV, 3, 4, %1, dstU, dstV, src, w
> > > +cglobal %2%3%4%5 %+ ToUV, 7, 7, %1, dstU, dstV, u1, src, u2, w, u3
> > > -cglobal %2ToY, 3, 3, %1, dst, src, w
> > > +cglobal %2ToY, 5, 5, %1, dst, unused0, unused1, src, w
> > > -cglobal %2ToUV, 3, 4, %1, dstU, dstV, src, w
> > > +cglobal %2ToUV, 4, 5, %1, dstU, dstV, unused, src, w
> > > -cglobal %2ToUV, 3, 4, %1, dstU, dstV, src, w
> > > +cglobal %2ToUV, 4, 5, %1, dstU, dstV, unused, src, w
> > >
> >
> > Right, OK
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > AFAIU, those prototypes were simplified by libav but it seems they were kept
> > > > unchanged in FFmpeg (because of a bug? because the prototypes could be shared
> > > > with the others functions?). Though, it might be important to check the if the
> > >
> > > the prototypes where the same originally, the additional fields
> > > where added by me to support planar RGB (packed was fine with 1 pointer
> > > but planar needed 3)
> > > libav later reimplemented planar rgb support by adding a seperate
> > > function pointer that takes 3, leaving the existing with 1 and adding
> > > a if() to all calls
> >
> > Wouldn't it make sense to keep them in sync?
>
> in sync with libav? to simplify merge work?
> that makes only sense when libav will continue to work on sws and
> there is something to merge ...
> and recent rumors dont point in that direction.
> that said we certainly can switch to the 2 fptr API. And we certainly
> should integrate all improvments anyone does on a swscale fork or
> another scaler.
>
Yes I was proposing to use the same prototypes as libav, assuming the
planar RGB feature you were talking about is now working differently (aka
the libav way) and these extended prototypes would have become
unnecessary.
[...]
--
Clément B.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20120930/349910a1/attachment.asc>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list