[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ffprobe: allocate & free AVFrame per process_frame()
Stefano Sabatini
stefasab at gmail.com
Tue Dec 24 12:47:18 CET 2013
On date Tuesday 2013-12-24 00:42:31 +0100, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> Fixes memleak
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
> ---
> ffprobe.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ffprobe.c b/ffprobe.c
> index 2bb72ab..b675f8b 100644
> --- a/ffprobe.c
> +++ b/ffprobe.c
> @@ -1783,13 +1783,13 @@ static void show_frame(WriterContext *w, AVFrame *frame, AVStream *stream,
>
> static av_always_inline int process_frame(WriterContext *w,
> AVFormatContext *fmt_ctx,
> - AVFrame *frame, AVPacket *pkt)
> + AVPacket *pkt)
> {
> AVCodecContext *dec_ctx = fmt_ctx->streams[pkt->stream_index]->codec;
> AVSubtitle sub;
> int ret = 0, got_frame = 0;
> + AVFrame *frame = av_frame_alloc();
>
> - avcodec_get_frame_defaults(frame);
> if (dec_ctx->codec) {
> switch (dec_ctx->codec_type) {
> case AVMEDIA_TYPE_VIDEO:
> @@ -1806,8 +1806,10 @@ static av_always_inline int process_frame(WriterContext *w,
> }
> }
>
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + av_frame_free(&frame);
> return ret;
> + }
> ret = FFMIN(ret, pkt->size); /* guard against bogus return values */
> pkt->data += ret;
> pkt->size -= ret;
> @@ -1822,6 +1824,8 @@ static av_always_inline int process_frame(WriterContext *w,
> if (is_sub)
> avsubtitle_free(&sub);
> }
> + av_frame_free(&frame);
> +
> return got_frame;
> }
>
> @@ -1853,7 +1857,6 @@ static int read_interval_packets(WriterContext *w, AVFormatContext *fmt_ctx,
> const ReadInterval *interval, int64_t *cur_ts)
> {
> AVPacket pkt, pkt1;
> - AVFrame *frame = NULL;
> int ret = 0, i = 0, frame_count = 0;
> int64_t start = -INT64_MAX, end = interval->end;
> int has_start = 0, has_end = interval->has_end && !interval->end_is_offset;
> @@ -1887,7 +1890,6 @@ static int read_interval_packets(WriterContext *w, AVFormatContext *fmt_ctx,
> }
> }
>
> - frame = av_frame_alloc();
> while (!av_read_frame(fmt_ctx, &pkt)) {
> if (selected_streams[pkt.stream_index]) {
> AVRational tb = fmt_ctx->streams[pkt.stream_index]->time_base;
> @@ -1920,7 +1922,7 @@ static int read_interval_packets(WriterContext *w, AVFormatContext *fmt_ctx,
> }
> if (do_read_frames) {
> pkt1 = pkt;
> - while (pkt1.size && process_frame(w, fmt_ctx, frame, &pkt1) > 0);
> + while (pkt1.size && process_frame(w, fmt_ctx, &pkt1) > 0);
> }
> }
> av_free_packet(&pkt);
> @@ -1932,11 +1934,10 @@ static int read_interval_packets(WriterContext *w, AVFormatContext *fmt_ctx,
> for (i = 0; i < fmt_ctx->nb_streams; i++) {
> pkt.stream_index = i;
> if (do_read_frames)
> - while (process_frame(w, fmt_ctx, frame, &pkt) > 0);
> + while (process_frame(w, fmt_ctx, &pkt) > 0);
> }
>
> end:
> - av_frame_free(&frame);
> if (ret < 0) {
> av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_ERROR, "Could not read packets in interval ");
> log_read_interval(interval, NULL, AV_LOG_ERROR);
Question: is the leak a regression, depending on the frame API dance?
If not, why didn't we spot it before?
The original intent of allocating the frame outside process_frame()
was to avoid unnecessary alloc/free calls, but if that it's now
required for some reasons then patch is fine.
Thanks.
--
FFmpeg = Fascinating & Fantastic Mastodontic Patchable Erotic Gem
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list