[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 6/7] lavc/hevc: mark decoder as experimental

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:19:48PM +0000, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 10/13/13, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:48:11AM +0000, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >> On 10/13/13, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 09:36:57AM +0000, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >> >> On 10/12/13, Timothy Gu <timothygu99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Oct 12, 2013 9:45 AM, "Michael Niedermayer" <michaelni at gmx.at>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
> >> >> >> ---
> >> >> >>  libavcodec/hevc.c |    2 +-
> >> >> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Why is this a separate patch?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [...]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Timothy
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> >> >> > ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> >> >> > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Why post this patchset at all?
> >> >
> >> > so everyone sees it and has a chance to comment.
> >> > Someone might spot a serious issue ...
> >> > someone might simply be against a patch and ask for it not to be
> >> > applied, this for example happened with the openhevc wrapper.
> >> > ...
> >> >
> >>
> >> If you plan to work on this then I'm ok with it.
> >> If you just want to commit this and 'forget' about it, i'm against it.
> >
> > I assume you talk about the hevc decoder and not the 2 line patch you
> > replied to.
> >
> > Iam just merging code here really, I do not intend to compete with
> > its authors if that is what you are suggesting.
> > rather the opposit, i would be happy to work together with all the
> > open hevc developers in ffmpeg but i have a long todo list so i
> > suspect they will do much more on the decoder than i will, but then
> > again i could be wrong ...
> 
> As you have long todo list and do not plan to seriously work on this
> it would be better if you just merge libav code when/whenever it comes.

my todo list is so long because i always get dragged into these kind of
discussions


[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

It is what and why we do it that matters, not just one of them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20131013/35265038/attachment.asc>