[FFmpeg-devel] Resubmit patch01 - RE: [patch 2/4] Fix bug for POWERLE: libavcodec/ppc/me_cmp.c
rongyan
rongyan236 at foxmail.com
Tue Nov 11 07:15:49 CET 2014
Hi,
Thanks for your patience and review.
New patch please find in the attachment. This is the first of two.
The fate test result is here:
Regards,
Rong Yan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [patch 2/4] Fix bug for POWERLE: libavcodec/ppc/me_cmp.c
------------------------
From: rongyan <rongyan236 at foxmail.com>
Date: 2014-11-07 17:37 GMT+08:00
To: FFmpeg development discussions <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
Hi,
There are 4 patches presented to fix bugs for POWER8 little endian. I will send 4 patches in 4 different email. This is the second.
It fixed the function hadamard8_diff8x8_altivec(), hadamard8_diff16x8_altivec(), sad16_x2_altivec(), sad16_y2_altivec(), sad16_xy2_altivec(), sad16_altivec(), sad8_altivec(), sse16_altivec(), sse8_altivec().
The fate test result on POWER BE and POWER LE after merge these 4 patches are attached here to facilitate the review:
The passed test cases change from 1679/2182 to 2010/2236.
Rong Yan
------------------
The world has enough for everyone's need, but not enough for everyone's greed.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
----------
From: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
Date: 2014-11-07 19:44 GMT+08:00
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 05:37:43PM +0800, rongyan wrote:
[...]
> @@ -88,11 +49,9 @@ static int sad16_x2_altivec(MpegEncContext *v, uint8_t *pix1, uint8_t *pix2,
> /* Read unaligned pixels into our vectors. The vectors are as follows:
> * pix1v: pix1[0] - pix1[15]
> * pix2v: pix2[0] - pix2[15] pix2iv: pix2[1] - pix2[16] */
> - vector unsigned char pix1v = vec_ld(0, pix1);
> - vector unsigned char pix2l = vec_ld(0, pix2);
> - vector unsigned char pix2r = vec_ld(16, pix2);
> - vector unsigned char pix2v = vec_perm(pix2l, pix2r, perm1);
> - vector unsigned char pix2iv = vec_perm(pix2l, pix2r, perm2);
> + vector unsigned char pix1v = VEC_LD(0, pix1);
> + vector unsigned char pix2v = VEC_LD(0, pix2);
> + vector unsigned char pix2iv = VEC_LD(1, pix2);
>
> /* Calculate the average vector. */
> vector unsigned char avgv = vec_avg(pix2v, pix2iv);
this would add vec_perm vec_ld and vec_lvsl to
vector unsigned char pix1v = vec_ld(0, pix1);
for big endian, which would slow it down
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Breaking DRM is a little like attempting to break through a door even
though the window is wide open and the only thing in the house is a bunch
of things you dont want and which you would get tomorrow for free anyway
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
----------
From: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
Date: 2014-11-10 22:53 GMT+08:00
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
Cc: Tony Lin <linzhaolover at gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:01:56PM +0800, rongyan wrote:
> Hi,
> New patch please find in the attachment. There are two patches to re-submit, this is the first.
> The fate test result is here:
>
> Rong Yan
[...]
> - vector unsigned char pix2l = vec_ld(0, pix2);
> - vector unsigned char pix2r = vec_ld(16, pix2);
> - vector unsigned char pix2v = vec_perm(pix2l, pix2r, perm1);
> - vector unsigned char pix2iv = vec_perm(pix2l, pix2r, perm2);
> + vector unsigned char pix2v = VEC_LD(0, pix2);
> + vector unsigned char pix2iv = VEC_LD(1, pix2);
this doubles the number of vec_ld() on big endian
[...]
> @@ -356,11 +168,8 @@ static int sad16_xy2_altivec(MpegEncContext *v, uint8_t *pix1, uint8_t *pix2,
> * pix1v: pix1[0] - pix1[15]
> * pix3v: pix3[0] - pix3[15] pix3iv: pix3[1] - pix3[16] */
> pix1v = vec_ld(0, pix1);
> -
> - pix2l = vec_ld(0, pix3);
> - pix2r = vec_ld(16, pix3);
> - pix3v = vec_perm(pix2l, pix2r, perm1);
> - pix3iv = vec_perm(pix2l, pix2r, perm2);
> + pix3v = VEC_LD(0, pix3);
> + pix3iv = VEC_LD(1, pix3);
>
> /* Note that AltiVec does have vec_avg, but this works on vector pairs
> * and rounds up. We could do avg(avg(a, b), avg(c, d)), but the
this also doubles the number of vec_ld() on big endian
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Its not that you shouldnt use gotos but rather that you should write
readable code and code with gotos often but not always is less readable
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 38368 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20141111/4bdfa8d7/attachment.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-libavcodec-ppc-me_cmp.c-fix-hadamard8_diff8x8_altive.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 33121 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20141111/4bdfa8d7/attachment.obj>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list