[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add metadata filters
Tobias Rapp
t.rapp at noa-archive.com
Wed Feb 10 10:50:02 CET 2016
On 10.02.2016 10:01, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 2/10/16, Tobias Rapp <t.rapp at noa-archive.com> wrote:
>> On 06.02.2016 23:30, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>>> On 2/6/16, Paul B Mahol <onemda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> patch attached.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Improved version attached.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> +
>>> +static int string(const char *value1, const char *value2, size_t length)
>>> +{
>>> + return !strncmp(value1, value2, length);
>>> +}
>>
>> If I understand correctly this function is used to compare if the start
>> of value2 matches value1. Maybe this function should be called
>> "starts_with" (also in the "function" option enum)?
>>
>>> +
>>> +static int equal(const char *value1, const char *value2, size_t length)
>>> +{
>>> + float f1, f2;
>>> +
>>> + if (sscanf(value1, "%f", &f1) + sscanf(value2, "%f", &f2) != 2)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + return f1 != f2;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int less(const char *value1, const char *value2, size_t length)
>>> +{
>>> + float f1, f2;
>>> +
>>> + if (sscanf(value1, "%f", &f1) + sscanf(value2, "%f", &f2) != 2)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + return f1 > f2;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int greater(const char *value1, const char *value2, size_t length)
>>> +{
>>> + float f1, f2;
>>> +
>>> + if (sscanf(value1, "%f", &f1) + sscanf(value2, "%f", &f2) != 2)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + return f1 < f2;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> [...]
>>
>> I think it would be better to not compare float values directly with
>> "==", "<" or ">". Instead use some code like "fabsf(f1 - f2) <= epsilon".
>>
>> BTW: Is the return value of "equal", "less" and "greater" inverse on
>> purpose?
>
> Not for equal, but for other it is.
OK, now I got it that the argument order is flipped but matches the
documentation. In that case it is a bit counter-intuitive that one has
to do something like
mode=print:key=mykey:value=1.0:function=less
to print all metadata values of "mykey" which are *bigger* than 1.0.
>>
>> Another sidenote: I have seen that some filters use a common expression
>> language (e.g. aeval, crop, scale). Not sure if this expression language
>> supports string operators or if it is limited to numbers but in my
>> opinion it would be great to re-use it here.
>
> Added and applied. Filter is easily extendable.
Thanks for adding expression support.
I know my response has come late and I'm only an occasional FFmpeg
developer so my thoughts might not have big weight. Still I think it
would have been more polite to first respond on the list to all my
comments (see the "starts_with" suggestion above) before applying the patch.
Regards,
Tobias
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list