[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Add support for vp9 in iso-bmff

[Yang Kongqun]

I am thinking of naming it as vpc instead, which aligns with avc.c and
hevc.c. What do you think?

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Vignesh Venkatasubramanian <
vigneshv-at-google.com at ffmpeg.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Kongqun Yang <yangkongqun at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Implemented according to the draft specification
> > > "VP Codec ISO Media File Format Binding":
> > >
> > >
> http://www.webmproject.org/vp9/#draft-vp-codec-iso-media-file-format-binding
> > >
> > > Change-Id: Iaa7ddf5524b17e8d79cd1923b26f096deeee6e91
> > > ---
> > >  libavformat/Makefile |   2 +-
> > >  libavformat/isom.c   |   3 +
> > >  libavformat/movenc.c |  15 +++++
> > >  libavformat/vpx.c    | 170
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  libavformat/vpx.h    |  33 ++++++++++
> >
> >
> > I don't particularly love the name "vpx.c" and "vpx.h", because they will
> > make people think this is related to libvpx instead of just generic
> > vp-something helpers. To prevent that, let's call it vpn.
>
> umm, vpn seems weird. how about 'vpcc' given that the functions in
> this file are about writing out the vpcc atom?
>
> >
> > Ronald
> > _______________________________________________
> > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
>
>
>
> --
> Vignesh
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>