[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/img2enc: Allow to reverse frame order

Michael Niedermayer michael at niedermayer.cc
Wed Mar 2 22:36:50 CET 2016


On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:38:27PM -0500, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Paul B Mahol <onemda at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 3/1/16, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <cehoyos at ag.or.at> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje <at> gmail.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>> > > So how does this mechanism look like for the requested
> >>> > > use case?
> >>> >
> >>> > man ln.
> >>>
> >>> As said, this is a completely ridiculous argument:
> >>> FFmpeg has always tried to provide new features, no
> >>> matter if other solutions existed or not.
> >>
> >>
> >> When you don't get your way, just shout "ridiculous!" and all will be okay.
> >
> > Its just few loc. I see nothing wrong with it, lets vote!
> 
> +1 to voting - why don't we actually put the developer committee to
> use instead of arguing about it?

if people want to vote on this, why not
personally ill probably abstain, as i even half misunderstood the
use case this was inteded for ;)

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Asymptotically faster algorithms should always be preferred if you have
asymptotical amounts of data
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20160302/9b7bb84b/attachment.sig>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list