[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCHv2 2/2] lavu/lfg: switch to Ziggurat algorithm for normal random number generation (WIP)
Ganesh Ajjanagadde
gajjanag at gmail.com
Sat Mar 12 17:11:32 CET 2016
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Michael Niedermayer
<michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 08:58:41AM -0500, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> Code taken from the Julia project, licensed under MIT:
>> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/master/base/random.jl, in turn
>> derived from: "The Ziggurat Method for generating random variables" - Marsaglia and Tsang.
>>
>> Paper and reference code: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v05/i08/. This is
>> well known to be the fastest method empirically for generating normal random
>> variables for a fixed PRNG source.
>>
>> Note that there are a large number of implementations with
>> various tunings, this was one of the simpler ones and also has a friendly
>> license.
>>
>> This results in ~ 3x speedup of random number generation:
>> old:
>> 15090 decicycles in av_bmg_get, 1 runs, 0 skips
>> 13140 decicycles in av_bmg_get, 2 runs, 0 skips
>> 10117 decicycles in av_bmg_get, 4 runs, 0 skips
>> [...]
>> 2133 decicycles in av_bmg_get, 524268 runs, 20 skips=60.4x
>> 2134 decicycles in av_bmg_get, 1048531 runs, 45 skips=61.3x
>> 2135 decicycles in av_bmg_get, 2097061 runs, 91 skips=61.9x
>>
>> new:
>> 7650 decicycles in av_gaussian_get, 1 runs, 0 skips
>> 5490 decicycles in av_gaussian_get, 2 runs, 0 skips
>> 3982 decicycles in av_gaussian_get, 4 runs, 0 skips
>> [...]
>> 812 decicycles in av_gaussian_get, 524281 runs, 7 skips
>> 813 decicycles in av_gaussian_get, 1048563 runs, 13 skips
>> 813 decicycles in av_gaussian_get, 2097131 runs, 21 skips
>>
>> and accordingly a ~2% speedup in aac encoding (-march=native, Haswell, clang):
>>
>> old:
>> ffmpeg -f lavfi -i anoisesrc -t 300 -y sin_new.aac 5.30s user 0.02s system 99% cpu 5.322 total
>> new:
>> ffmpeg -f lavfi -i anoisesrc -t 300 -y sin_new.aac 5.16s user 0.03s system 99% cpu 5.198 total
>>
>> Function added as av_gaussian_get with documentation, minor bumped.
>>
> [...]
>
>> +static inline double ziggurat(AVLFG *lfg)
>> +{
>> + while (1) {
>
>> + uint64_t r = (((uint64_t)av_lfg_get(lfg) << 32) + av_lfg_get(lfg)) & 0x000fffffffffffff;
>
> the order of Function evaluations is undefined here i think
And why would that matter? Aren't these just approximations to truly
uniform 32 bits? rand()<<32 + rand() is common:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8120062/generate-random-64-bit-integer,
and it is not undefined AFAIK, merely unspecified:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24348383/order-of-execution-of-function-calls-within-a-line-undefined.
>
>
> [...]
> --
> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>
> I know you won't believe me, but the highest form of Human Excellence is
> to question oneself and others. -- Socrates
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list