[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavd/xcbgrab: do not try to create refcounted packets.
Clément Bœsch
u at pkh.me
Tue Oct 25 20:56:45 EEST 2016
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 02:29:37PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> The framework will allocate a buffer and copy the data to it,
> that takes time. But it avoids constently creating and
> destroyng the shared memory segment, and that saves more time.
>
> On my setup,
> from ~200 to ~300 FPS at full screen (1920×1200),
> from ~1400 to ~3300 at smaller size (640×480),
> similar to legacy x11grab.
>
> Plus, shared memory segments are a scarce resource,
> allocating potentially many is a bad idea.
>
> Note: if the application were to drop all references to the
> buffer before the next call to av_read_frame(), then passing
> the shared memory segment as a refcounted buffer would be
> even more efficient, but it is hard to guarantee, and it does
> not happen with the ffmpeg command-line tool. Using a small
> number of preallocated buffers and resorting to a copy when
> the pool is exhausted would be a solution to get the better
> of both worlds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas George <george at nsup.org>
> ---
> libavdevice/xcbgrab.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavdevice/xcbgrab.c b/libavdevice/xcbgrab.c
> index 9da46c8..702e66c 100644
> --- a/libavdevice/xcbgrab.c
> +++ b/libavdevice/xcbgrab.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
> typedef struct XCBGrabContext {
> const AVClass *class;
>
> + uint8_t *buffer;
> +
> xcb_connection_t *conn;
> xcb_screen_t *screen;
> xcb_window_t window;
> @@ -219,22 +221,16 @@ static int check_shm(xcb_connection_t *conn)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void dealloc_shm(void *unused, uint8_t *data)
> -{
> - shmdt(data);
> -}
> -
> -static int xcbgrab_frame_shm(AVFormatContext *s, AVPacket *pkt)
> +static int allocate_shm(AVFormatContext *s)
> {
> XCBGrabContext *c = s->priv_data;
> - xcb_shm_get_image_cookie_t iq;
> - xcb_shm_get_image_reply_t *img;
> - xcb_drawable_t drawable = c->screen->root;
> - uint8_t *data;
> int size = c->frame_size + AV_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE;
> - int id = shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, size, IPC_CREAT | 0777);
> - xcb_generic_error_t *e = NULL;
> + uint8_t *data;
> + int id;
>
> + if (c->buffer)
> + return 0;
> + id = shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, size, IPC_CREAT | 0777);
> if (id == -1) {
> char errbuf[1024];
> int err = AVERROR(errno);
> @@ -243,15 +239,31 @@ static int xcbgrab_frame_shm(AVFormatContext *s, AVPacket *pkt)
> size, errbuf);
> return err;
> }
> -
> xcb_shm_attach(c->conn, c->segment, id, 0);
> + data = shmat(id, NULL, 0);
> + shmctl(id, IPC_RMID, 0);
> + if ((intptr_t)data == -1 || !data)
> + return AVERROR(errno);
> + c->buffer = data;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int xcbgrab_frame_shm(AVFormatContext *s, AVPacket *pkt)
> +{
> + XCBGrabContext *c = s->priv_data;
> + xcb_shm_get_image_cookie_t iq;
> + xcb_shm_get_image_reply_t *img;
> + xcb_drawable_t drawable = c->screen->root;
> + xcb_generic_error_t *e = NULL;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = allocate_shm(s);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
>
> iq = xcb_shm_get_image(c->conn, drawable,
> c->x, c->y, c->width, c->height, ~0,
> XCB_IMAGE_FORMAT_Z_PIXMAP, c->segment, 0);
> -
> - xcb_shm_detach(c->conn, c->segment);
> -
> img = xcb_shm_get_image_reply(c->conn, iq, &e);
>
> xcb_flush(c->conn);
> @@ -264,25 +276,12 @@ static int xcbgrab_frame_shm(AVFormatContext *s, AVPacket *pkt)
> e->response_type, e->error_code,
> e->sequence, e->resource_id, e->minor_code, e->major_code);
>
> - shmctl(id, IPC_RMID, 0);
> return AVERROR(EACCES);
> }
>
> free(img);
>
> - data = shmat(id, NULL, 0);
> - shmctl(id, IPC_RMID, 0);
> -
> - if ((intptr_t)data == -1)
> - return AVERROR(errno);
> -
> - pkt->buf = av_buffer_create(data, size, dealloc_shm, NULL, 0);
> - if (!pkt->buf) {
> - shmdt(data);
> - return AVERROR(ENOMEM);
> - }
> -
> - pkt->data = pkt->buf->data;
> + pkt->data = c->buffer;
> pkt->size = c->frame_size;
Sorry if this is a dumb question but: can you describe what happens if the
previous packet still held the same pkt->data = c->buffer?
That is, when and how the buffer copy does happen?
(no need for a av_buffer_create with RO flag?)
--
Clément B.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list