[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/5] lavc : yami : add libyami decoder/encoder
wm4
nfxjfg at googlemail.com
Sat Sep 24 16:18:44 EEST 2016
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 02:34:56 +0200
Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 04:22:33PM +0800, Jun Zhao wrote:
> > add libyami decoder/encoder/vpp in ffmpeg, about build step,
> > please refer to the link: https://github.com/01org/ffmpeg_libyami/wiki/Build
>
> > Makefile | 1
> > configure | 27 ++
> > ffmpeg.c | 4
> > ffmpeg.h | 1
> > ffmpeg_libyami.c | 85 ++++++
> > libavcodec/Makefile | 8
> > libavcodec/allcodecs.c | 6
> > libavcodec/libyami.cpp | 429 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > libavcodec/libyami.h | 59 ++++
> > libavcodec/libyami_dec.cpp | 527 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > libavcodec/libyami_dec.h | 56 ++++
> > libavcodec/libyami_enc.cpp | 551 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > libavcodec/libyami_enc.h | 70 +++++
> > libavutil/pixdesc.c | 4
> > libavutil/pixfmt.h | 5
> > 15 files changed, 1833 insertions(+)
> > d5ebbaa497e6f36026a4482dc6e0f26b370561b5 0001-lavc-yami-add-libyami-decoder-encoder.patch
> > From 7147fdb375cb7241d69823d8b9b6e94f66df3a32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao at intel.com>
> > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:36:14 +0800
> > Subject: [[PATCH] 1/5] lavc : yami : add libyami decoder/encoder.
>
> it seems people are not in favor of this patchset, judging from this
> thread.
> If you are interrested in maintaining this code externally as a patch
> or git repository, then please add some reasonable link/mention to
> some page on https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki so users are aware of its
> existence and can find it
>
> If you belive thats incorret and people in fact majorly support this
> patchset then you can also start a vote of course.
>
> ill mark this patchset as rejected on patchwork as that seems the
> de-facto current situation
>
From one person who tried to use it (and who's also in the list), I
heard that ffmpeg native vaapi decoding/encoding works better for him.
So there's probably no reason to use this patch at all.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list