[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] aptx: implement the aptX bluetooth codec

[Aurelien Jacobs]

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 12:52:34AM +0000, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> On 8 November 2017 at 22:41, Aurelien Jacobs <aurel at gnuage.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:26:03PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:06:09PM +0100, Aurelien Jacobs wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Compute the convolution of the signal with the coefficients, and
> > reduce
> > > > + * to 24 bits by applying the specified right shifting.
> > > > + */
> > > > +av_always_inline
> > > > +static int32_t aptx_qmf_convolution(FilterSignal *signal,
> > > > +                                    const int32_t coeffs[FILTER_TAPS],
> > > > +                                    int shift)
> > > > +{
> > > > +    int32_t *sig = &signal->buffer[signal->pos];
> > > > +    int64_t e = 0;
> > > > +
> > >
> > > > +    for (int i = 0; i < FILTER_TAPS; i++)
> > >
> > > "for (int" is something we avoided as some comilers didnt like it,
> > > iam not sure if this is still true but there are none in the codebase
> >
> > If you insist on this I will of course change it, but hey, we require
> > a C99 compiler since a long time and we use so many features of C99
> > that I really don't get why we couldn't use "for (int".
> > I can't imagine that any relevant C compiler would not support this
> > nowadays !
> > What I propose is to get this in as is, and see if anyone encounter
> > issue with any compiler. If any issue arise, I will of course send a
> > patch to fix it.
> >
> > Here is an updated patch.
> >
> >
> Send another patch because some people are beyond convincing and its really
> pissing me off. Really. In particular maybe those compiler writers at
> Microsoft who seem to think shipping something that doesn't support such a
> simple yet important feature is important.
> Or maybe users who don't want to update a 6 year old version of msvc.
> Or maybe us because we support compiling with msvc at all when its clearly
> _not_ a C compiler and this project is written in C.

Here you go.

Just for reference, splitting the déclaration out of the for loop added
19 lines in this file, which is a 2.3 % increase of the line count.
(I'm not sure this file is representative of the rest of the code base)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-aptx-implement-the-aptX-bluetooth-codec.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 35843 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20171109/445a206a/attachment.patch>