[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/mpegts: unset DTS/PTS for subtitle PES packets if PCR not available
Paul B Mahol
onemda at gmail.com
Mon Dec 17 20:42:41 EET 2018
On 12/17/18, Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 08:50:41PM +0200, Jan Ekström wrote:
>> Fixes issues when a subtitle packet is received before PCR for the
>> program has been received, leading to wildly jumping timestamps
>> on the lavf client side as well as in the re-ordering logic.
>>
>> This usually happens in case of multiplexes where the PCR of a
>> program is not taken into account with subtitle tracks' DTS/PTS.
>> ---
>> libavformat/mpegts.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/libavformat/mpegts.c b/libavformat/mpegts.c
>> index edf6b5701d..8f6ee81cda 100644
>> --- a/libavformat/mpegts.c
>> +++ b/libavformat/mpegts.c
>> @@ -1219,6 +1219,7 @@ skip:
>> || pes->st->codecpar->codec_id ==
>> AV_CODEC_ID_DVB_SUBTITLE)
>> ) {
>> AVProgram *p = NULL;
>> + int pcr_found = 0;
>> while ((p = av_find_program_from_stream(pes->stream,
>> p, pes->st->index))) {
>> if (p->pcr_pid != -1 && p->discard !=
>> AVDISCARD_ALL) {
>> MpegTSFilter *f = pes->ts->pids[p->pcr_pid];
>> @@ -1242,6 +1243,7 @@ skip:
>> // and the pcr error to this packet
>> should be no more than 100 ms.
>> // TODO: we should interpolate the
>> PCR, not just use the last one
>> int64_t pcr = f->last_pcr / 300;
>> + pcr_found = 1;
>> pes->st->pts_wrap_reference =
>> st->pts_wrap_reference;
>> pes->st->pts_wrap_behavior =
>> st->pts_wrap_behavior;
>> if (pes->dts == AV_NOPTS_VALUE ||
>> pes->dts < pcr) {
>> @@ -1258,6 +1260,15 @@ skip:
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> + if (!pcr_found) {
>> + av_log(pes->stream, AV_LOG_VERBOSE,
>> + "Forcing DTS/PTS to be unset for a "
>> + "non-trustworthy PES packet for PID %d as
>> "
>> + "PCR hasn't been received yet.\n",
>> + pes->pid);
>> + pes->dts = pes->pts = AV_NOPTS_VALUE;
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>> break;
>
> Assuming i understand the intend correctly ...
> could the packet be put in a buffer and once a PCR has been encountered be
> returned based on that?
> This seems better as no timestamp would be lost
>
> thx
No, that is awful idea. You do not waste memory on that.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list